Coverage by AI RMF function
Govern70%
Map55%
Measure48%
Manage60%
AI-governance coverage vs the framework, a posture read and not a compliance attestation or a leak rate.
AI governance
Governance posture at a glance
Your AI-governance posture vs NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001, with an AI use register and a model-risk register. Coverage vs a framework, never a claim that your AI is safe or compliant. No CUI: the registers hold the use-case name and labels only, never model inputs or outputs. Source: your SELF / CISO Assistant CE dogfood.
Sample data — preview only. This portal shows high-level project progress with canned figures; it never holds your CUI, security documentation, or evidence. Documents open in your secure enclave via links.
NIST AI RMF coverage58%
ISO 42001 coverage41%
AI use register
One row per governed AI deployment: name, owner, tool, data classes (labels), plane, risk tier, status. The register holds the use-case name and labels only, never the underlying data or model I/O.
Open the full AI use register in your secure workspace →Model-risk register
Per-model risk posture (labels and status). No CUI. Governance-doc bodies live in your enclave; the portal holds pointers.